Ask questions and get answers about Celonis products from experts and peers.
Recently active
Is this official Celonis email address: partner@celonis.com from which you are sending the newsletter to your customers?
There is no sign-up functionality for Celonis for Consulting Partnership. I signed up but as a Guest and no feature to change from Guest to Partner signup. Can you please kindly change my sign up to a Partner in the name of Sceamdo Technologies? Thank you
Want PQL Query for Paid Early.
Hello, I open this question that was already asked by another user 5 months ago and not answered from Celonis. Moreover, I'm not allowed to comment or ask for update on that post if the post is older than 30 days. I would like to query data in an Action Flow from the Knowledge Model and not from the Data Model. Currently I have an Action Flow connected to a Data Model and I have modules like Tools (set multiple variables) replicating the same KPIs I have in the Knowledge Model. If I need to update a KPI in the Knowledge Model I have to remember to update it as well in the action flow, this causes high maintenance and possibility of error. This feature is critical since one of the main goals of using Studio is the centralization of KPI definitions into a single source of truth, the knowledge model. If you have any update on this topic I'd appreciate if you can share it with the community. Thanks. BRAlejandro
How to force load empty csv/xls files using pycelonis? Its a client requirement
Starter Kit version for object-centric process mining (2023-07-18) An Accounts Payable Starter Kit version that supports object-centric process mining is available now from the Celonis Marketplace. The object-centric Accounts Payable Starter Kit version 1.0.0 uses the Accounts Payable perspective that’s supplied with our object-centric data model, or a custom Accounts Payable perspective that you have created in your team. Before you set up the object-centric version of the Starter Kit, you’ll need to load the object-centric data model with your data and validate the Accounts Payable perspective. The Starter Kit uses the objects and events that you’ve already built from your source system data and stored in the OCPM Data Pool. To get started, see Quickstart: Extract and transform your data into objects and events. To use this version of the Starter Kit, you'll need a Celonis EMS subscription that includes object-centric process mining. If you can't see the Data > Objects and
Hi everyone! I am trying to set up triggers on my sanbox enviroment but It does not has that.. Does anyone know why?
Dear Experts , I have P2P activity logs and i have users column along with it infront of activity who executed it. Is it possible to create a network diagram using network explorer with each node being users along with value of transactions they are executing ? Can you advise ?
コンポーネントのアクティビティエクスプローラーで検索されるアクティビティを固定したいです。 通常の状態だとアクティビティエクスプローラーのアクティビティを選択しても、パッケージを移動すると値がリセットされてしまいます…
Hence we would like to delete the rest of the components in Business View.But Delete option is not available for them. (We tried copying Business view into another and delete the other components to keep only Execution gap list(Inefficiencies)) Please advise. Regards,Deepti
I want to define the dimension so it includes activities in 2 conditions, that only has occurred before specific activities (ideally defined by LIKE "string%") OR upto specific activites. However, what I found so far for cropping methods (e.g. crop to null) requires specific name of the activity and doesn't allow LIKE predicate. Is there a way to crop activities to anything before specific condition / first_occ of specific condtion?
How to apply Line break in KPI List for each KPI..?
need to compare each of the the Part Name under Ticket.Id 123456 if any of them are the same in Ticket.Id 345691 and in the Ticket table (in the same row as the Ticket.Id) the list of Part names also found in the succeeding Ticket.Id Ticket TableTicket.Id Event time123456 8-Jul345691 9-Jul Parts tableTicket.Id Part Name123456 PartName1123456 PartName2123456 PartName3345691 PartName1345691 PartName3
Hi All,Im trying to get a breakdown in a table at the top by defining a Custom object, but im not able to adapt it in the table.Below is the screenshot from Market place where they have done something similar,but im not able to replicate it.
For me, the output is not clear - Given 'A' has 4 unique combinations (Munich - DE, NH, UK, TN) - as expectedGiven that 'B' has 0 unique combinations. As per my understanding, the O/P I expect is 3 (Berlin - DE, UK, TN)Given that 'C' has 1 unique combination (Berlin- NH) - as expectedGiven that 'D' has 0 unique combinations - as expected (all the unique combinations wrt Berlin - DE, NH, UK, TN are covered in the B and C Cases).Given that 'E' has 3 unique combinations (Bristol - DE, NH, UK) - as expectedGiven that 'F' has 2 unique combinations. As per my understanding, the O/P I expect is 1 (Bristol - TN) - as the combinations (Bristol - DE, NH, UK) are covered in the case of 'E' above. Can you please correct me if my understanding of the concept is wrong? Also please provide your inputs.
Hi everyone, I am trying to set a Display Rule for a KPI List in a View in Studio. I want to use the Display Rule to set the background color of the KPI based not on a fixed value, but rather on a dinamic input coming from a table in the data model. I wanted to configure this input using PQL just as it is done with variables in a regular analysis, but I have not found such an option in Views or Knowledge Models. I would want to know if it is possible to work in an analog way to an analysis in studio, defining a variable with input written in PQL, and then using such variable as a parameter in the Display Rule YAML code. is that possible? Thank you!!!Best regardsJavier
I have a process which has tens of activities and 10000 variants with no major contributors. Because the process is not standardized even the top 100 variants only contribute to 23% of cases. So, I need to expand the number of variants I consider but this keeps adding more activities associated with each of the variants because of which reading the graph becomes harder. What I would like to do is basically customize the graph in the variant explorer for e.g. by filtering or hiding or grouping activities and also hide some connections between activities based on the case count so that it is easy to read.
I am using this formula but I know that is not right. : AVG(PU_COUNT ("_X_INC_CASE", ROUND_DAY("_X_INC_SECONDARY_ACTIVITIES"."_EVENTTIME"), KPI("Efficient Conditions_ All Reopen") = 'Efficient')) The X_INC_CASE has unique values and the X_INC_SECONDARY_ACTIVITIES has all events
Innovation Generation 💡 What do you think is the best way to map and measure scope 3.1 material emissions?Comment your thoughts and ideas below! Kind Regards,The Celonis Sustainability Team 🌍
Embracing Sustainability - The Celonis Training Academy 🏆 The Celonis Sustainability Team invites you to further your expertise surrounding sustainability topics by embarking on a learning journey with our training academy. The two most important courses to complete to further your knowledge on sustainability topics are the Sustainability Base Camp and the Sustainability Bootcamp. The course will help you to improve your expertise on sustainability and apply it in your day to day job and life. It will empower you to work towards a greener future since after all there is no Planet B! The Sustainability Base Camp will:Explain key sustainability concepts & challengesExplore the main drivers of Climate ChangeIdentify the relevance of sustainability in a corporate context by identifying strategies & approaches to further human progress in sustainability The Sustainability Bootcamp will: Explain how to drive sustainable business execution by integrating sustainability int
I am looking for the way how to apply in Action Flow Alerting Mails the condition "apply different color classes based on percentage ranges"? It needs to be dynamic where the colors will be changed based on value. Thanks a lot!!
From the table it can be seen that the throughput time from first occurrence of "Send Purchase Order" to first occurrence of "Record Goods Receipt" is 14 days. This is confirmed by the calculation also. Still the Process Explorer indicates 5 days for the same case. Any idea for the "error" in the Process Explorer (there are no component filter enabled in the process explorer)?
Are there customers that are using both BI tools and Celonis in their environments? If yes, how do they use both tools? Thank you
Does Celonis offer capabilities to simulate business processes performance? If a business process is found to be in-efficient, does Celonis offer capabilities to simulate an optimized version of the same process?
REMAP_TIMESTAMPS (celonis.com)
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.