Starting with a router is totally fine. I've got a similar use case where the router is the first module.

What I've found to be helpful is the "Explain Flow" button at the top. It'll provide a sequence of the modules.

The other option is building the HTML table prior to routing to the appropriate users. If the email addresses are built into a table in Celonis, you can create arrays within the action flow to set those aside and then aggregate them after the fact.

The map() function then gets your list (array) of emails and stores them there. You wouldn't necessarily have to have an additional router.

The way you have it is totally fine and definitely works!

Hi Matt,

thanks for answering to my post.

I used the "explain flow" button a lot while building this. But it does not tell you why a module gets priority against another. I really broke a couple of neurons last week trying to find a way for this to work. If there are not documentation available, I hope somebody is working on it 😅 .

Cheers

Yeah the priority is a little confusing sometimes. I'm not entirely sure what takes priority before the other. Glad you were able to figure it out!

It would be looking something like this

About the processing of modules, there are processed as per the sequence in the sense whichever module gets executed first based on the query and result.

The setting of sequential processing is for when you enable it and it has error handling done

this Link for information "Sequential Processing"

Please let me know in case of any further questions.

Thanks for the tip @avinash.gutte12 about the sleep tool, I will have a go next week.

I did enabled the sequential processing setting, but it did not make any difference, but maybe something else was in the way.

when you say the modules are "processed as per the sequence in the sense whichever module gets executed first based on the query and result", are you saying this is a matter of processing time ? meaning the fastest route gets completed first, is this what I understand ?

If yes, is there a way to anticipate which route is going to be slower/faster in order to avoid these kinds of issues?

Thanks

About your comment

meaning the fastest route gets completed first, is this what I understand ?

-> Yes that is correct

Sequential process takes effect when you are error handler directives like break, and when there are failures, those failures would be processed first and then the next bundles

Router will forward all records to all routes in a go, at same time, It depends on the processing of each route.

For Ex.

you are fetching only emails from route 2 which seems less operation than route 1

and you are doing some aggregation in route 1 which would take more time as compared to 2

I hope this helps.

@avinash.gutte12 this is the best insight I had on this subject !! thank you

not sure this information is clearly documented, it definively should be.

have a great day

Hi all! I have a similiar issue but I need that the add the Text agregator of the 1st route in the email, how I can do that?

Hi @hugo.dario.peña.12 

 I havent tested @avinash.gutte12 suggested solution yet

but I wonder if you should add the GET MULTIPLE VARIABLE module After the SLEEP module in order to get all the necessary inputs available for the outlook module