Benchmark view without variables

hey so the embedded views approach you used in legacy is basically gone in enhanced views but there is actually a proper way to do this now.
 

Celonis Studio has a native benchmarking view architecture where you use benchmark variables, basically benchmark1 and benchmark2 acting as two independent filter contexts side by side. your dropdowns and process filters feed into each variable separately so they dont bleed into each other which is exactly what you were manually solving before with the double embed trick. you can read more about this here https://docs.celonis.com/en/creating-benchmarks-in-views.html and also the enhanced variables docs here https://docs.celonis.com/en/enhanced-variables.html
 

the view modules feature is there too and it sounds like what you tried but for benchmarking specifically the recommended path is the benchmark variables approach not modules, more on that here https://docs.celonis.com/en/guidelines-benchmarking.html. also found a community thread with basically the same problem you described which might help https://community.celonis.com/general-product-q-a-2/hi-i-am-working-with-views-and-trying-to-create-two-process-explorers-within-one-page-and-to-make-benchmark-possible-i-need-independent-filter-dropdowns-4089

hey ​@pablo.azagr , please let me know, what worked for you !

take care 

Hi @gagan1,

Thank you for your response. I’ve created several benchmark views using variables in line with Celonis’ guidelines, but unfortunately this approach doesn’t fully cover the functionality I was expecting.

With embedded views, users could apply process filters (via the Process Explorer) that remained scoped within the embedded view itself. This enabled much more flexibility, as users could explore freely without relying on pre-defined KPIs. In contrast, the variables-based approach requires filters to be implemented in advance by an analyst, which limits that level of interactivity.

I hope this clarifies my point. It’s a bit disappointing that Enhanced Views don’t currently support this capability, as it was particularly valuable in practice.

Kind regards,

Hi ​@pablo.azagr , thanks for adding more context and yes this clarifies your point, I hope this issue get resolved soon,

btw you may try raising a ticket to support.


take care