Hi,

not sure if I got you right but having one case with Activities A (5:00), B (5:10) and C (5:10) you can only have flow A-B-C or A-C-B.

How should it be possible to have two flows for just one case?

In case of activities happening exactly on the same time the sequence is done based on your SORTING information (if you use any kind of Sorting as this is optional).

BR

Dennis

What should i do if i want flow A-B, A-C in one flow?

Hi Akash,

with the help of timestamps (or sorting) you can visualize your cases' process flow as a linear sequence of steps, represented by your activities.

Therefore, in this context, it is not totally clear what you want to obtain. A-B and A-C can't coexist in the same linear process, but should be seen as one the variant of the other and so at least two cases must be involved (as Dennis pointed out before, one flowing through A-B-C and the other through A-C-B).

My advice is to revise the process and the activities with a process expert (on customer side), because i guess that the real question is how activity B and activity C are related.

👍

I’m assuming this question is based on a case-centric process. I want to create something similar in OCPM. Does anyone know if this is possible, given that theoretically I could have one object flowing through A-B-C and another through A-C-B?

building up on ​@carmem.caval follow up, but what if B > C and C > B is not supposed to happen in the process as they are meant to happened paralel to each other? So I must have A > B > D, just as A > C > D, but the process explorer keep giving me the incorrect A > B > C or A > C > B